The Effect of Different Implant Sizes on The Bone Resorption After Retain Prosthesis (Fixed Bridge or Overdenture)
Keywords:
Implant Sizes, fixed Bridge, Overdenture, Fixed bridgeAbstract
In this article we will explain the effect between different implant sizes, in the term of its effect on bone resorption about implant and trying to clarify many factors related to success of teeth implant with less bone resorption in addition to trying to focus on most important success factors which would decrease resorption of bone around implant which is often by increase friction between bone and implant whether this friction by increasing length of implant and or increasing diameter of implant and determine which one is better in term of reducing pressure on the bone.
References
Ding, X., Liao, S. H., Zhu, X. H., Zhang, X. H., & Zhang, L. (2009). Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 11(4), 279-287.
Kong, L., Sun, Y., Hu, K., Li, D., Hou, R., Yang, J., & Liu, B. (2008). Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: A three‐dimensional finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthodontics, 17(4), 286-293.
Pokorny DK. Current procedures in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1971 Jul;15(3):685-710. PMID: 4932297.
Wheelis, S. E. (2017). Investigation of titanium oxide characteristics on healing abutments: retrieval characterization and soft-tissue compatibility (Doctoral dissertation).
Sullivan, R. M. (2009). Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Quintessence Publishing Co.
Parameswaran, A. (2013). Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 16(5), 480-480.
Bertoldi, C., et al. (2017). "Contraindications and considerations for fixed prosthetic treatments." Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 61(1), 1-6.
Ferro, K. J., Morgano, S. M., Driscoll, C. F., Freilich, M. A., Guckes, A. D., Knoernschild, K. L., ... & Twain, M. (2017). The glossary of prosthodontic terms.
Davis, D. M. (1990). The role of implants in the treatment of edentulous patients. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 3(1).
Batenburg, R. H., Meijer, H. J., Raghoebar, G. M., & Vissink, A. (1998). Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 13(4).
Turkyilmaz, I., Tözüm, T. F., Tumer, C., & Ozbek, E. N. (2006). A 2‐year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading. Journal of periodontology, 77(12), 1998-2004.
Ekfeldt, A., Johansson, L. Å., & Isaksson, S. (1997). Implant-supported overdenture therapy: a retrospective study. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 10(4).
Hutton, J. E., Heath, M. R., Chai, J. Y., Harnett, J., Jemt, T., Johns, R. B., ... & Herrmann, I. (1995). Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 10(1).
Lee, C. K., & Agar, J. R. (2006). Surgical and prosthetic planning for a two-implant–retained mandibular overdenture: A clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 95(2), 102-105.
Miyamoto, I., Tsuboi, Y., Wada, E., Suwa, H., & Iizuka, T. (2005). Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery—clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone, 37(6), 776-780.
Holmgren, E. P., Seckinger, R. J., Kilgren, L. M., & Mante, F. (1998). Evaluating Parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. Journal of Oral Implantology, 24(2), 80-88.
Tada, S., Stegaroiu, R., Kitamura, E., Miyakawa, O., & Kusakari, H. (2003). Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 18(3).
Allum, S. R., Tomlinson, R. A., & Joshi, R. (2008). The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clinical oral implants research, 19(6), 553-559.
Matsushita, Y., Kitoh, M., Mizuta, K., Ikeda, H., & Suetsugu, T. (1990). Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. The Journal of oral implantology, 16(1), 6-11.
Goiato, M. C., Pesqueira, A. A., Dos Santos, D. M., Haddad, M. F., & Moreno, A. (2014). Photoelastic stress analysis in prosthetic implants of different diameters: mini, narrow, standard or wide. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR, 8(9), ZC86.
Arιsan, V., Bölükbaşι, N., Ersanlι, S., & Özdemir, T. (2010). Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5–10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 21(3), 296-307.
Yu, W., Jang, Y. J., & Kyung, H. M. (2009). Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress: a quantitative approach. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 24(1).
Akça, K., & Íplikçioğlu, H. (2001). Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 16(5).
Lekholm, U., van Steenberghe, D., Herrmann, I., Bolender, C., Folmer, T., Gunne, J., ... & Lindén, U. (1994). Osseointegrated Implants in the Treatment of Partially Edentulous Jaws: A Prospective 5-Year Multicenter Study. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 9(6).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
